- 31 Mar, 2021
- 0 Comments
- 2 Mins Read
LGST 325 Project 1
Instructions:
Review the BACKGROUND and INTRODUCTION module in Content.
Research relevant Maryland law to determine whether there any applicable statutes regarding the operation of emergency vehicles. After completing research:
Prepare a legal memorandum that addresses the following;
A. Analyze and determine whether you recommend suing Officer Preston and why.
Discuss any specific benefits or problems with suing Officer Preston
B. Analyze and determine whether you recommend suing Anne Arundel County and why.
Discuss any specific benefits or problems with suing the Anne Arundel County and why.
Support all conclusions comprehensively
Use proper Bluebook citation.
Format
Memorandum
TO: Rebecca Patty, Esq.
FROM: (your name), Paralegal
RE: Paula Harris – Case and Statutory Law Analysis
DATE:
A.
B.
Label all parts of memorandum.
Support all conclusions in detail, specifically, in depth, and with reference to relevant assigned course materials.
Use correct, complete sentences in paragraph format.
Arial or Times Roman, size 12 font.
Review the Project Before Submitting It
Thoroughly read the presentation to ensure all required elements are present.
Review the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the most points possible for this assignment.
Proofread for spelling and grammatical issues.
Use the spell and grammar check in Word.
Submit the project in the Assignment Folder The assignment submitted to the Assignment Folder will be considered a student’s final product, and therefore, ready for grading by the professor. It is incumbent upon the student to verify the assignment is the correct submission.
NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work, and only your work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to understand and follow the Academic Integrity and plagiarism policy.
Due Date
Apr 6, 2021 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Rubric for LGST 325 Projects 1 & 3 – 10% each – Spring 2020
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria
Level 1 – Excellent
Level 2 – Very Good
Level 3 – Good
Level 4 – Needs Improvement
Criterion Score
Legal Analysis, Critical Thinking, Application
4 points
4 pts
Submission met all expectations including, a strong and accurate use of critical thinking, legal analysis thoroughly applied to all issues identified, facts and/or cases analyzed.
3.6 – 4.0
3.56 points
3.56 pts
Submission met most of the expectations including, a strong and accurate use of critical thinking, legal analysis thoroughly applied to all issues identified, facts and/or and cases analyzed.
3.2 – 3.56
3.16 points
3.16 pts
Submission met some of the expectations including a generally strong and accurate use of critical thinking, legal analysis thoroughly applied to all issues identified, facts and/or cases analyzed.
2.8 – 3.16
2.76 points
2.76 pts
Submission met few of the expectations with little to no accurate use of critical thinking, legal analysis applied to issues identified, facts and/or and cases analyzed.