What is the best way to justify toleration?
You must answer the question exactly as it is written.
READ THE LECTURES. READ THE ARTICLES BEFORE MAKING THE ESSAY.
SEMINAR QUESTIONS: I need the ESSAY To be able to answer at least some of these questions.
What are the benefits and disadvantages of censoring holocaust or climate change denial?
What impact does our contemporary experience of conspiracy theories, ‘fake news’ and electoral interference have on Mill’s view of the benefits of free discussion?
Does it matter if the autonomy justification may not protect non-autonomous ways of life from interference?
Should our justification of toleration be consequentialist or non-consequentialist?






