- 16 Mar, 2021
- 0 Comments
- 3 Mins Read
case
Case:
You can use any retirement plan including your own.
Evaluate the employee stock plan or retirement savings plan (such as a 401K plan) of your company, or that of a company of a friend or relative. In light of Sarbanes-Oxley, does the plan provide sufficient information and financial protection for the employees? Do you believe that the plan, as designed, is structured in such a way that current employees will be motivated to greater productivity, and new employees will be attracted to your company? Describe feasible measures that would improve the plan.
Any sources used in the analysis should be cited following APA guidelines. Deductions will be taken for grammatical/punctuation/spelling errors. The following rubric will be used to evaluate the student’s case study analysis in the remaining modules.
To upload your completed work, click on the Submit Assignment button.
Rubric
BUS5710 Case Study Rubric (revised)
| BUS5710 Case Study Rubric (revised) |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Factors |
| 15.0 to >13.0 pts
Exemplary
The student presents a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the critical factors provided in the case. The various stakeholder groups are identified and their concerns and viewpoints are recognized. The student gives appropriate weight and consideration to the identified factors and presents a reflective, ‘big picture” perspective appropriate for an experienced senior manager. |
13.0 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
The student presents an accurate and complete analysis of the critical factors provided in the case. Multiple stakeholders are identified and a robust summary of the dilemma is provided. |
10.0 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The student misinterprets what the main dilemma is and/or omits information that is pertinent to the case. A brief analysis of the case is presented, with a narrow or limited viewpoint which negates the concerns of several stakeholders. |
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpportunities |
| 15.0 to >13.0 pts
Exemplary
The student presents a robust, creative and innovative list of several potential solutions to the case study. The potential solutions reflect a comprehensive understanding of the dilemma presented, and meet or exceed the minimal professional guidelines/best practices. |
13.0 to >10.0 pts
Satisfactory
The student presents three alternative solutions that display appropriate reflection and consideration to the dilemma presented. The solutions are realistic given the data presented. |
10.0 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The student presents less than three alternatives to the dilemma presented and/or the potential solutions do not address the dilemma presented. |
|
15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSolution |
| 20.0 to >17.0 pts
Exemplary
The student presents an innovative solution that recognizes and balances the needs of all of the stakeholders. Detailed support is provided for the chosen solution, and includes research that identifies best practices by experts in the field and specific data from the provided case. The presented solution includes a thorough discussion of an effective implementation strategy. This strategy recognizes, and prepares for, realistic challenges and roadblocks that may occur during the implementation stage. The student includes a reflective analysis of possible long-term implications to the chosen solution. |
17.0 to >13.0 pts
Satisfactory
The student presents an appropriate solution for the case that addresses the needs of multiple stakeholders. The student logically defends the chosen solution using data and research. Information regarding the implementation is presented and recognition of potential challenges is provided. The student discusses the likely implications of using the presented solution. |
13.0 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The student presents an inappropriate or incomplete solution for the case. Needs of key stakeholders are ignored and/or solution does not align with best practices or professional guidelines. Minimal support is given for the chosen solution. Implementation issues are addressed in an inadequate manner and little consideration is given to the implications of the selected solution. |
|
20.0 pts |
| Total Points: 50.0 |
PreviousNext
