Advocacy

Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
Breadcrumb Abstract Shape
  • 18 Mar, 2021
  • 0 Comments
  • 36 Secs Read

Advocacy

2000-word minimum, cites (and effectively integrates!) at least FIVE academic sources and perspectives, captioned multimodality

Peer edits due (marginal and write-up for BOTH peers in your group): August 15

Note: Peer edits follow the same formula as they did for Part One: Marginal AND write-up. DO NOT focus on grammar corrections for the marginal comments. Those should focus on whether the peer has a) a coherent and clear argument, marking any confused presentation or missing information; b) effectively introduced and engaged sources, marking any aspects of the source presentation that feel underdeveloped or unclear or any claims that are not followed up with researched evidence; c) used captioning and footnotes correctly and effectively (along with other multimodals and signposting). See below for more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *